Skip to main content

Why the Smartphone Ecosystem Duopoly is Set

How can second-tier mobile device manufacturers innovate in a global marketplace that's dominated by the presence of two vendors that guide industry standards, shape design principles and lead the efforts of an established applications ecosystem?

The current assessment is that this continues to be a challenging scenario.

The ​ABI Research device portal sales channel analysis reveals tough times are ahead for most smartphone vendors, as the balance of power remains with Samsung and Google Android -- combined with the legacy Apple iPhone and iOS influence.

The smartphone market is entering a new, more mature stage in its growth, where execution rules over innovation. Samsung is dominating the mobile sales channel, with more than double the number devices on offer than any other vendor across the 13 markets and multiple online retailers studied.


"Our analysis showed that Samsung is dominating the sales channel at nearly every price point, with only Apple challenging Samsung at the high end of the market," said Nick Spencer, senior practice director at ABI Research.

This leaves little room for the other vendors to compete, especially the other Android vendors and those using uncompetitive operating system ecosystems.

Despite some carrier’s efforts to create a more balanced smartphone device vendor industry with their use of subsidy, ultimately they are obliged to fulfill consumer demand and at the moment that means Samsung/Android and Apple.

According to Spencer's assessment of the upside market opportunities, "The balance of power looks set to remain with Apple and Samsung for the foreseeable future."

The course of the smartphone market is looking increasingly set as it enters a more mature stage on the current innovation curve. This is bad news for the players vying for the third ecosystem position.

Popular posts from this blog

Frontier AI Peaked. Here's What Comes Next

The prevailing narrative around artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of relentless scale. Bigger models, bigger clusters, bigger budgets. The assumption, largely unchallenged until recently, was that raw parameter count translated directly into competitive advantage. New research from Omdia suggests it's time to retire that assumption. According to the latest market study by Omdia, parameter growth in frontier AI models has slowed to around 5 percent annually since 2021, a stark contrast to the more than hundredfold expansion seen between 2019 and 2021. Enterprise AI Market Development For executives who have been making infrastructure and investment decisions based on the assumption that AI would keep demanding ever-larger, ever-more-expensive hardware, this finding deserves serious attention. The race to the top of the model size leaderboard has, at least for now, plateaued. Crucially, Omdia's analysts are not reading this as an AI winter. Alexander Harrowell, senior pri...