Skip to main content

Market Ripe for New Breed of MVNO

Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs) are in a second phase of growth, made possible by the advent of 3G mobile phone services. 3G's data-centric capabilities have opened up new markets for MVNOs targeting specific high-end subscriber groups. With CAPEX and running costs far lower than those of the facilities-based operators whose networks they use, MVNOs can succeed with far fewer subscribers.

In the past MVNO markets were dominated by low-cost providers buying wireless access wholesale and reselling it under their own brand names, offering plans aimed at a low-cost customer's needs. Now 3G allows MVNOs to offer more than just low cost: data services that may not be available from the mainstream, facilities-based operators.

Tier 1 operators focus on the broad customer segment that mainly wants voice and SMS and may send the occasional picture, but is less interested in things like 3D gaming or broadband video. "These new MVNOs recognize a market segment that is ripe for them, where they can provision their own data and content targeted not to a mass-market but to a small segment," says Kenneth Hyers, ABI Research's principal analyst of global wireless operator research.

"That might be kids playing 3D real-time games, or somebody that just has to have the latest device from South Korea. Or someone wanting continual sports updates from Mobile ESPN. Or adult content." The US will continue to be the most successful single market for MVNOs, Hyers says. However in absolute terms, by the end of this decade Europe will have more MVNO customers than the US.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...