Skip to main content

Lazy Marketing Spending: Paid vs. Organic


As detailed in eMarketer's new Search Marketing report, lazy marketers spend far more for paid placement than Web site optimization. That's partially due to paid advertising being far more costly than optimization efforts.

But it's also due to perception: Paid search results are more readily seen than the results from boosting organic listings, therefore it's easier for search marketers to find the budget for paid advertising than optimization.

According to a recent report from the Search Engine Marketing Professional Organization, paid placement made up 83.0 percent of 2005's spending. Meanwhile, spending for organic search engine optimization (SEO), a potentially more effective form of search marketing, received only 11.2 percent of search engine marketing budgets last year.

Popular posts from this blog

The AI Application Integration Challenge

Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly become the defining force in business technology development, but integrating AI into applications remains a formidable challenge. According to a recent Gartner survey, 77 percent of engineering leaders identify AI integration in apps as a major hurdle for their organizations. As demand for AI-powered solutions accelerates across every industry, understanding the tools, the barriers, and the opportunities is essential for business and technology leaders seeking to evolve. The Gartner survey highlights a key trend: while AI’s potential is widely recognized, the path to useful integration is anything but straightforward. IT leaders cite complexities in embedding AI models into existing software, managing data pipelines, ensuring security, and maintaining compliance as persistent obstacles. These challenges are compounded by a shortage of skilled AI engineers and the rapid evolution of AI technologies, which can outpace organizational readiness and...
Read more