Skip to main content

Consumer Personalization Differentiates IPTV

Telephony reports that this year is shaping up to be a key year for IPTV. Verizon and AT&T are launching IPTV services. In Europe, BT is launching and France Telecom is seeing take-up of its offerings. These aren't telcos' first forays into TV, nor their first attempts at content. The earlier moves generally have not been successful, so how can telcos succeed at offering IPTV services?

There is a clear indication from consumers that they want a TV experience that is more flexible than current Pay TV and Free-to-Air TV options. CSMG ADVENTIS research indicates that consumers are dissatisfied with their current TV experience: more than 50 percent of consumers miss more than one program per week, while 85 percent frequently find there is nothing on TV they want to watch.

In addition, success of digital video recorders also points to interest in a flexible TV viewing experience. Overall U.S. DVR penetration is now 6.5 percent, and 17 percent of DirecTV�s subscribers use DirecTV DVRs.

Leveraging advances in technology, telcos that offer broadband are aiming to meet this demand by offering IPTV services. Now that cable operators are offering voice services, many telcos feel they have no choice -- they must offer TV services to survive. While the definition of IPTV varies, it typically includes a mix of traditional broadcast TV, on-demand TV and other content and applications.

Despite demand for new TV services as well as improvements to technology and costs, telcos face a number of challenges in IPTV. Competition for TV viewers is fierce -- there is a real risk that telcos will become competitively squeezed between incumbent pay-TV operators moving to meet the demand for new TV services and online players such as Yahoo and Google.

As PCCW has already proven, a-la-carte channel selection and other modes of consumer personalization will help to differentiate IPTV, and dramatically increase market penetration.

Popular posts from this blog

Frontier AI Peaked. Here's What Comes Next

The prevailing narrative around artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of relentless scale. Bigger models, bigger clusters, bigger budgets. The assumption, largely unchallenged until recently, was that raw parameter count translated directly into competitive advantage. New research from Omdia suggests it's time to retire that assumption. According to the latest market study by Omdia, parameter growth in frontier AI models has slowed to around 5 percent annually since 2021, a stark contrast to the more than hundredfold expansion seen between 2019 and 2021. Enterprise AI Market Development For executives who have been making infrastructure and investment decisions based on the assumption that AI would keep demanding ever-larger, ever-more-expensive hardware, this finding deserves serious attention. The race to the top of the model size leaderboard has, at least for now, plateaued. Crucially, Omdia's analysts are not reading this as an AI winter. Alexander Harrowell, senior pri...