Skip to main content

U.S. Gambles with Legacy Telecom Policies

TelecomTV has a very informative interview with Simon Torrance of STL Partners, on a topic entitled "The Web 2.0 Threat " -- discussing the results that uncovers globally, and across functional organizations, telco constituents are frustrated that they're (collectively) puzzled by what their customers want, and where their business should be heading.

The collective assessment exposes a major difference between how the telco sector will evolve in the European and U.S. markets. The implication: the U.S. government, specifically the Justice Department and the FCC, have essentially taken the approach of allowing industry consolidation that has recreated dominant monolithic companies -- AT&T and Verizon -- that are structurally best suited to the dynamics of a bygone era.

If you believe, as I do, that the forward-looking economic viability of a nation is undeniably tied to enabling an appropriately evolving presence within the global networked economy, then there's reasonable concern that the U.S. government has gambled with this country's future -- against the tide of informed professional opinion.

What's interesting about Mr. Torrance's commentary is they he is very careful in choosing his words to characterize the apparent crisis, both for telcos and national government policy, in a very diplomatic way. Clearly, it's difficult to deliver 'damning evidence' in a diplomatic way. Granted, he would prefer that the focus stays on the issues at hand, and not merely shooting the messenger.

While Mr. Torrance couched the focus of his study as "how do we make money in an IP-based world" -- I see this as a much bigger issue, which is "how can a nation ensure that it has both the IP infrastructure and e-commerce policies in place to remain globally competitive." Meaning, this issue is fundamentally much more significant than telco revenues and associated profit margins.

Again, the Internet is the underlying transport for e-commerce, in the same way that waterways, railways, highways and airports have been instrumental in national, regional and local economic development. That said, can the U.S. effectively compete with two large telecom players, who will be making choices that directly impact America's future role in the world?

Moreover, if it's true that the leadership and middle management of legacy telcos acknowledge that they're unaware of real customers needs, and therefore unable to decide how to meet those needs with products and services -- who is assessing that risk relative to the U.S. economy, and then guiding public policy accordingly?

It's not a rhetorical question, since I don't know the answer. We are left with that sinking feeling once again as Mr. Torrance concludes his remarks -- if hope isn't a strategy, then shouldn't the U.S. quickly develop a national telecom infrastructure policy, like other forward-looking nations?

When you place your bet on a couple of large contenders, shouldn't they understand their markets and be confident that they can sustain their business without regulatory protections. If that's simply not realistic, then wouldn't it be wise to spread the risk, and thereby ensure that the likelihood of sustainable competitiveness isn't such an unpredictable gamble?

What's to stop the U.S. government from forcing a structural separation, in anticipation and preparation that 'just in case' these monolithic U.S. companies make the wrong strategic choices, one or two misguided CEOs aren't in a position to unduly handicap the national economy?

Popular posts from this blog

Industrial Cloud Computing Apps Gain Momentum

In the manufacturing industry, cloud computing can help leaders improve their production efficiency by providing them with real-time data about their operations. This has gained the attention of the C-suite. Total forecast Industrial Cloud platform revenue in manufacturing will surpass $300 billion by 2033 with a CAGR of 22.57 percent, driven by solution providers enhancing platform interoperability while expanding partner ecosystems for application development. ABI Research found the cloud computing manufacturing market will grow over the next decade due to the adoption of new architectural frameworks that enhance data extraction and interoperability for manufacturers looking to maximize utility from their data. Industrial Cloud Computing Market Development "Historically, manufacturers have built out their infrastructure to include expensive data housing in the form of on-premises servers. The large initial upfront cost of purchasing, setting up, and maintaining these servers is

AI Semiconductor Revenue will Reach $119.4B

The Chief Information Officer (CIO) and/or the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) will guide Generative AI initiatives within the large enterprise C-Suite. They may already have the technical expertise and experience to understand the capabilities and limitations of Gen AI. They also have the authority and budget to make the necessary investments in infrastructure and talent to support Gen AI initiatives. Enterprise AI infrastructure is proven to be expensive to build, operate and maintain. That's why public cloud service provider solutions are often used for new AI use cases. AI Semiconductor Market Development Semiconductors designed to execute Artificial Intelligence (AI) workloads will represent a $53.4 billion revenue opportunity for the global semiconductor industry in 2023, an increase of 20.9 percent from 2022, according to the latest worldwide market study by Gartner. "The developments in generative AI and the increasing use of a wide range AI-based applications in data c

Demand for Quantum Computing as a Service

The enterprise demand for quantum computing is still in its early stages, growing slowly. As the technology becomes more usable, we may see demand evolve beyond scientific applications. The global quantum computing market is forecast to grow from $1.1 billion in 2022 to $7.6 billion in 2027, according to the latest worldwide market study by International Data Corporation (IDC). That's a five-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 48.1 percent. The forecast includes base Quantum Computing as a Service, as well as enabling and adjacent Quantum Computing as a Service. However, this updated forecast is considerably lower than IDC's previous quantum computing forecast, which was published in 2021, due to lower demand globally. Quantum Computing Market Development In the interim, customer spend for quantum computing has been negatively impacted by several factors, including: slower than expected advances in quantum hardware development, which have delayed potential return on inve